PCORI Comparative Effectiveness Research 2026

PCORI

Active
Route 2: AI-Enhanced
4.15

Weighted Score

Amount

$500K - $2.0M

Deadline

2026-09-01

LOI Required

Yes

Funder Type

nonprofit

PCORI Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) 2026

Priority: 🟑 CYCLE 1 MISSED - TARGET CYCLE 2 Cycle 1 LOI Deadline: January 6, 2026 - ❌ PASSED


⚠️ DEADLINE STATUS

CycleLOI DeadlineFull AppStatus
Cycle 1Jan 6, 2026May 5, 2026❌ PASSED
Cycle 2Apr 28, 2026Sept 1, 2026🟒 TARGET

Action Required: Prepare for Cycle 2 LOI submission (April 28, 2026).


Quick Facts

FieldValue
FunderPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
ProgramComparative Effectiveness Research 2026
AmountUp to $2,000,000
LOI DeadlineJanuary 6, 2026
Full ApplicationMay 5, 2026 (if LOI accepted)
TypeFederal (Independent nonprofit)
Prior RelationshipPipeline - High priority target

Funding Details

  • Award Range: Up to $2M (varies by category)
  • Broad Pragmatic Studies Categories:
    • Category 1: Up to $5M direct costs
    • Category 2: $5M - $12M direct costs
    • Category 3: $12M - $30M direct costs
  • Total Available: $120M+ annually
  • Duration: 3-5 years typically
  • Cost Sharing: Not required

PCORI's Critical Requirements

Six Foundational Expectations for Partnerships

  1. Authentic Partnership - Patients/stakeholders as true partners
  2. Meaningful Engagement - Not token involvement
  3. Co-Learning - Bidirectional knowledge exchange
  4. Sustainability - Long-term relationship building
  5. Transparent Processes - Open communication
  6. Equity and Power-Sharing - Balanced decision-making

Strategic Alignment

Recommended Route

Route 3: AI + Healthcare Research - FIU Thrive evaluation research

Why PCORI Fits

  1. Patient-Centered Focus: NHELP's community engagement model
  2. Health Equity Priority: PCORI specifically prioritizes disparities research
  3. Comparative Effectiveness: Thrive-enhanced vs. standard care comparison
  4. Community Health Worker Integration: CHW partnerships valued
  5. Large Award Potential: Up to $2M+ for significant research

Alignment Scores

DimensionScoreNotes
Funder Alignment4.5Perfect mission match
Capability Match4.0Research infrastructure needed
Success Probability3.5Competitive but strong fit
Strategic Value5.0Major research funding
Resource Efficiency3.0Significant application effort
Weighted Score4.10HIGH PRIORITY

Research Concept

Proposed Study Design

Title: "Comparative Effectiveness of AI-Enhanced SDOH Screening and Navigation vs. Standard Care in Underserved Communities"

Primary Question: Does FIU Thrive-enhanced SDOH screening and closed-loop referral improve patient-centered outcomes compared to standard community health center care?

Study Arms:

  1. Intervention: FIU Thrive + CHW navigation + closed-loop referrals
  2. Control: Standard SDOH screening and referral processes

Outcomes:

  • Primary: SDOH needs addressed at 6 months
  • Secondary: Health service utilization, patient satisfaction, health status

Application Strategy

Key Elements

  1. Patient Advisory Board: Establish community advisory with patient representatives
  2. Comparative Framework: Clear intervention vs. control design
  3. Health Equity Lens: Frame around disparities reduction
  4. Pragmatic Design: Real-world implementation focus
  5. CHW Integration: Community health worker partnerships

Recommended Framing

"This patient-centered comparative effectiveness study will evaluate whether AI-powered social determinants of health screening and navigation through FIU Thrive, delivered via the NeighborhoodHELP mobile health program, improves patient-centered outcomes compared to standard community health center practices in Miami-Dade County's underserved communities..."


Timeline (Updated for Cycle 2)

DateActionStatus
Jan 6, 2026Cycle 1 LOI❌ MISSED
Feb-Mar 2026Develop research concept🟒 CURRENT
Mar 2026Establish patient advisory boardπŸ”΅ PENDING
Apr 1-15, 2026Finalize LOI materialsπŸ”΅ PENDING
Apr 28, 2026CYCLE 2 LOI DEADLINE🎯 TARGET
May-Jul 2026Full application (if LOI accepted)πŸ”΅ PENDING
Sept 1, 2026FULL APPLICATION🎯 TARGET

Patient Advisory Board Requirements

Composition Needed

  • 3-5 community members/patients from NHELP service area
  • 1-2 CHW representatives
  • 1-2 community organization partners
  • Clinical stakeholder representation

Engagement Structure

  • Quarterly meetings minimum
  • Co-design of research questions
  • Review of study materials
  • Input on dissemination strategy

Contacts


Supporting Documents Needed

In This Folder

  • application/ - LOI and full application materials
  • research/ - PCORI program research
  • drafts/ - Research concept drafts
  • supporting-docs/ - Community letters, data

Key Preparation Items

  • Preliminary patient outcomes data from NHELP
  • FIU Thrive platform documentation
  • Community partner letters of support
  • FIU IRB preliminary consultation
  • Research team biosketches

PCORI Portfolio Analysis

Related Funded Projects to Reference

  • Community health worker interventions
  • SDOH screening implementation studies
  • Health equity research in underserved populations
  • Digital health comparative effectiveness

Notes

  • PCORI offers Engagement Awards ($100K-$500K) - consider as relationship-builder
  • Sign up for PCORI funding alerts
  • Review PCORI's Methods Research priorities (AI/ML applications)
  • Connect with PCORI program officers early in process

Alignment Scores

4.15

Weighted Score

Funder Alignment5.0
Capability Match4.5
Success Probability3.0
Strategic Value5.0
Resource Efficiency3.0

Strategic Notes

EXCELLENT FIT - Thrive enables patient-centered research. Compare Thrive vs standard care.